Wildfires: Causes, Ecological Effects, and Management

Authored by: Robbie Zhang, Reviewed by: Jerry Wen

Abstract:

In this paper, we examine:

1. The key causes and drivers of large wildfires – including climate and biological factors – are examined through illustrative cases.

2. The role of wildfire in ecological succession and how environments recover after fire.

3. The complex impacts of wildfires on ecosystems range from benefits, such as enhanced biodiversity, to detrimental effects. 

Taken together, the analysis supports the thesis that fire is ecologically beneficial when it occurs within historical regimes that sustain biodiversity and landscape heterogeneity, but becomes damaging when altered by suppression legacies, invasive species, and climate-driven extremes. The conclusion connects these findings to practice by listing the management that could be effective for restoring natural fire regimes.

Introduction

Wildfires are uncontrolled fires that spread rapidly across vegetated wildland areas, consuming forests, grasslands, or shrublands, and everything in their path (NASA ICESat-2 Mission). These fires can ignite from natural causes, such as lightning, or from human activities, including unattended campfires, discarded cigarettes, or downed power lines (OEHHA). In recent decades, wildfire activity has grown in intensity and scale.

According to the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), the annual average area burned in California from 2020 to 2024 was approximately three times higher than in the 2010s, reflecting a sharp increase in wildfire activity in the state. Behind this, a broader trend is evident. According to National Interagency Fire Center data, the United States has experienced an increase in total area burned, with all ten of the largest wildfire years on record occurring since 2004. For example, in 2020, California experienced its first “gigafire” with the August Complex Fire (August–November 2020, Northern California) (CAL FIRE, ‘2020 Fire Season Incident Archive’), which was ignited by lightning and ultimately burned over 1 million acres (OEHHA). After investigating such extreme fire events, some experts are warning that the region has entered an era of "mega-fires." (OEHHA). Wildfires now pose a significant threat to lives and properties, while also reshaping ecosystems on an unprecedented scale.

Wildfires are a natural occurrence in many ecosystems. Regions such as California have a unique environment that is particularly susceptible to wildfires. Historically, periodic, and controllable fires (which occur every 5–20 years in some forests and chaparral) helped maintain healthy ecosystems by clearing dead biomass and recycling nutrients. “Moreover, nutrients… return more quickly into the soil. In this way, fire increases soil fertility” (National Geographic Society). However, modern changes, such as aggressive fire suppression, climate change, and human development, have disrupted these natural fire cycles (CDFW). Recent California fires have caused tragic losses of life and property, and severely impacted multiple local tree-living species, such as coast redwoods, giant sequoias, and Joshua trees, which were once thought to be relatively fire-resilient (CDFW). This paper focuses on the impacts of wildfires on ecological processes and ecosystems. While it is beneficial when ecosystems operate within historical fire regimes (frequency, intensity, seasonality) to which they are adapted, it is also harmful when human actions and a warming climate alter these regimes. To evaluate this thesis, the paper is organized to (1) analyze ignition causes and environmental drivers of large fires, (2) explain wildfire as a secondary-succession disturbance with key adaptations and pioneer species, and (3) compare and contrast ecological benefits against modern high-severity impacts.

Causes and Environmental Factors of Large Wildfires

This section argues that the interaction of ignition sources with dry fuels, weather, and terrain determines whether a fire remains ecologically beneficial within historical regimes or escalates into harmful, high-severity megafires outside them.

Wildfires start when an ignition source meets dry, combustible material under the right conditions. Natural ignition most often comes from lightning, which historically sparked many remote fires. In recent times, human-related ignitions have become the dominant source of fires in many regions – examples include sparks from power lines, machinery, vehicle exhaust, cigarettes, or arson (NASA ICESat-2 Mission). For instance, the Camp Fire in Paradise, California– which occurred in November of 2018 burned ~153,000 acres and caused 85 deaths – was ignited by a failed electric transmission line surrounded by dry, windy weather, exemplifying how infrastructure failures can trigger catastrophic fires in vulnerable conditions (CPUC, “Order Instituting an Investigation into the 2018 Camp Fire” 10). Whether a small ignition grows into a large wildfire, however, depends greatly on environmental factors: the dryness and amount of fuel, weather conditions (primarily temperature, humidity, and wind), and terrain.

Fuel and Drought: When fuel is abundant and dry due to drought, even small ignitions can push fire behavior beyond its historical frequency and intensity. After years of fire suppression, many forests have accumulated an excess of fuel in the form of dense undergrowth and dead wood. When vegetation has dried out due to drought and heat, even a small spark can set off a large-scale wildfire. Drought kills or weakens plants and lowers fuel moisture, so that forests, which might usually resist fire, become highly flammable. In the period 2012–2016, for example, drought-related beetle infestations killed vast swathes of pines in California’s mountains, adding to the combustible fuel load (“Current National Statistics”). 

Such drying of fuels has been linked to the surge in large fires; one indicator is that since the 1980s, the Western U.S. has seen its wildfire season lengthen by several weeks, correlating with warmer springs and longer summer dry periods under climate change (EPA). Generally, high temperatures and low humidity significantly increase fire risk by drying out the soil and vegetation. 

Wind and Weather Extremes: Extreme winds, heat, and low humidity amplify the spread and intensity. This section shows how climate change could lead to a disturbance in the regime. Once a fire starts, weather factors such as wind can drastically influence its spread and size. Strong, dry winds not only fan flames across firebreaks but also further desiccate fuels (dry plants and other flammable substances) ahead of the fire front (Fovell). In Southern California, the Santa Ana winds are hot, fast offshore winds that can intensify hurricane strength, further spreading the preexisting fire at an exceedingly high speed (Fovell). When ignited, fires under Santa Ana wind events can grow 3.5–4.5 times faster in terms of daily burned area than under typical conditions (Billmire et al). An appropriate example was the Thomas Fire in December 2017 (Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties, CA). This fire was surrounded by an intense Santa Ana wind episode that sent flames racing across dry chaparral hillsides, becoming the largest wildfire in modern California at the time. CAL FIRE reported that unusually strong and persistent Santa Ana winds were the largest factor in the spread of the Thomas Fire (CAL FIRE). These winds, combined with exceptionally low humidity, created a “perfect storm” for wildfire, overcoming firefighting efforts until winter rains arrived. Other weather extremes, such as heatwaves and lightning storms, can also trigger large fires. In August 2020, a rare dry lightning storm during a record heatwave ignited numerous fires across Northern California, joining into the August Complex gigafire (OEHHA). This event highlighted how clusters of lightning ignitions, occurring under extreme heat and drought conditions, can overwhelm the capacity to control fires, resulting in unprecedented burn extents.

Vegetation and Species Composition: The plant community, especially invasive grasses and stressed forests, can shorten fire-return intervals or increase severity. The types of plants in an area, along with their condition, significantly influence wildfire behavior. Some vegetation communities are inherently more flammable – for example, Mediterranean-climate shrublands, such as California’s chaparral, contain oils and resins that ignite readily, producing intense fires. In forest ecosystems, dense conifer stands with accumulated leaf litter can sustain crown fires (fire spreading through tree canopies) that are harder to suppress. In recent decades, ecologists have observed that the introduction of invasive plant species can alter fire regimes by changing fuel characteristics. A striking example is cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), an invasive Eurasian grass now widespread in the western United States. Cheatgrass is an annual grass that grows densely and then dies back each summer, creating a continuous bed of fine, dry fuel. Research has found that cheatgrass-infested areas are highly flammable and tend to burn more frequently; the species forms “fuels” that increase fire intensity and often decrease the intervals between fires in invaded grasslands(Davison et al.). This shortened fire-return interval can prevent slower-growing native shrubs and perennial plants from reestablishing, effectively locking in cheatgrass dominance and leading to a self-perpetual grass-fire cycle. “In other words, more cheatgrass leads to a higher risk of fire where fire perpetuates cheatgrass, and more cheatgrass, in turn, perpetuates potentially larger fires and more frequent fires.” (Mealor et al. 9-10). Cheatgrass Management Handbook, written by Mealor A. Brain et al, also stated that Cheatgrass could postpone and inhibit the growth of slow-growing plant species such as sagebrush after a fire; in fact, it would take estimately around 25-50 years for a sagebush to recover, thus leading to a significant decrease in biodiversity as the Simpson index has dropped. Observational studies have documented that in some western ecosystems, cheatgrass invasion has doubled the frequency of fires, contributing to larger burned areas and the conversion of sagebrush shrublands into annual grasslands. In some cases, even the absence of certain traditional practices has influenced the occurrence of fires. For millennia, people in California regularly set small fires to manage underbrush and create mosaic habitats, thereby reducing fuel accumulations, as stated in a previous study and analysis, “cultural burners contend that typical agency-led prescribed burns tend to be more focused on reducing fuels and avoiding canopy mortality” (Long et al.). The curtailment of these cultural burns, followed by decades of aggressive fire suppression in the 20th century, left a legacy of “fuel-loaded” forests primed for large, severe fires (CDWF). In summary, large wildfires emerge from a confluence of factors: an ignition source (natural or human), abundant dry fuels (resulting from drought, plant senescence, or fuel accumulation), conducive weather conditions (characterized by heat, low humidity, and wind), and often an ecosystem adapted to burn. When these align – as seen in events like the 2017 firestorm in California (when a heat wave, dry vegetation, and fierce winds converged) – even a single spark can unleash a massive inferno.

Wildfire as an Ecological Disturbance and Succession

This section explains wildfire as a secondary-succession disturbance that, within historical regimes, catalyzes orderly recovery via pioneers and fire adaptations—evidence for fire’s beneficial role under the right conditions.

Ecologically, wildfire is classified as a secondary succession process. Unlike primary succession (which starts on bare ground with no soil, such as after a lava flow or glacial retreat), secondary succession occurs after a disturbance (fire, storm, hurricane, etc.) disrupts an existing ecosystem but leaves behind soil, seeds, and surviving organisms (Lukes). A wildfire typically does not erase all life on a site – while it may consume vegetation and wildlife above ground, the soil often remains intact and is enriched with charred organic matter and ash. Many microbes, fungal spores, seeds, and dormant buds survive in the soil or in protected structures, providing a biological legacy that drives post-fire recovery. The recolonization of plant life after a wildfire is a textbook example of secondary succession (Lukes). Immediately after a fire, the landscape may appear blackened and lifeless, but this stage is short-lived. What follows is an ordered sequence of regenerative phases, often beginning within days or weeks of the burn.

Pioneer Species and Early Successional Stage: The first plants to emerge on a freshly burned site are the pioneer species – hardy, fast-growing organisms that exploit the sudden abundance of resources (light and nutrients) and the lack of competition. In many western North American forests, one of the emblematic pioneer plants is fireweed (Chamerion angustifolium), a wildflower whose bright magenta blooms often carpet the burned ground in the first spring or summer post-fire (Lukes). For example, after the 2016 Lake County fires in California, observers noted hillsides blanketed in fireweed in the next growing season, a vivid sign of nature’s rebirth on the charred slopes (Lukes). Other herbaceous plants quickly follow – grasses and forbs whose seeds either survived in the soil seed bank or are dispersed from surrounding areas. In California’s foothill woodlands and chaparral, native wildflowers such as lupines, poppies, and monkeyflowers often flourish in the first spring after a fire, taking advantage of the open space and nutrient-rich ash bed (Lukes). These pioneer plants are typically short-lived (annuals or opportunistic perennials) that focus energy on rapid reproduction. They stabilize the soil with their roots and add organic matter as they live and die back, thus setting the stage for later successional species. Along with native pioneers, unfortunately, invasive weeds can also capitalize on disturbances; land managers often watch for invasive thistles or grasses that may need control after fires.

Adaptations for Post-Fire Regeneration: Many plants in fire-prone ecosystems have evolved remarkable adaptations to survive fires or regenerate afterward. Some common fire-adaptive strategies include: (1) Fire-stimulated seed germination – certain plants produce seeds that lie dormant until exposed to the heat or chemical cues from smoke/charred wood. At this point, they germinate en masse. Examples are chaparral shrubs like ceanothus and manzanita, whose seeds often require the intense heat of fire to crack their hard coats and initiate growth （Lukes). (2) Serotiny – a trait where seeds are stored in cones or fruits that only open and release after being heated by fire. A classic case is the lodgepole pine: “Seeds from the Lodgepole pine tree (Pinus contorta) are enclosed in pine cones covered in resin that must be melted to release the seeds.” The cones open upon heating, releasing seeds that will sprout in the nutrient-rich ash bed (National Geographic Society). (3) Resprouting from protected tissues – many trees and shrubs can survive fire by resprouting from basal buds, lignotubers, or roots after their tops are burned. Oaks and many chaparral shrubs (chamise, scrub oak, manzanita)possess subterranean structures that store energy and develop buds, enabling them to send up new shoots within weeks of a fire sweeping through (Lukes). Similarly, redwoods and eucalypts can resprout from their scorched trunks. (4) Thick bark and fire resistance – fire-adapted trees like ponderosa pine have very thick bark that insulates vital structure from heat (Lukes), and they tend to shed lower branches as they grow, reducing fire spread into the crown. Thanks to these adaptations, the biomesphere and natural habitats within fire-prone regions are resilient to periodic fires, based on these self-indulgent plants. Indeed, ecologists classify many California ecosystems as fire-dependent or fire-adapted, meaning they require fires at intervals to maintain ecological balance (CDWF). Prior to modern fire suppression, frequent low to moderate-intensity fires (ignited by lightning or Native American burning) would sweep through and recover these landscapes every decade or so, preventing any one species from dominating (Long et al.).

Many fire-affected ecosystems do eventually recover substantial biodiversity and biomass. Animal life returns as the vegetation regenerates: insects and pollinators arrive with the wildflowers, herbivores graze the new growth, and predators follow. Some wildlife species even benefit in the short term; for example, certain wood-boring beetles, known as “fire chaser” beetles, are attracted to burns immediately to lay eggs in freshly scorched bark (National Geographic Society). Ecological succession after wildfire thus involves not only plants but also animals repopulating and exploiting the changed habitat. The timeframe for a complete successional cycle (from a burned area back to a mature forest, for instance) can span many decades to centuries. However, even in its intermediate stages, a post-fire landscape is far from barren – it is teeming with life in various forms. It often exhibits a unique assemblage of species adapted to the transient open conditions. In sum, wildfire resets the ecological clock, initiating secondary succession whereby pioneer species give way to a sequence of later colonists, ultimately tending toward the pre-fire state (unless conditions have shifted or repeated disturbances intervene). This process of recovery showcases nature’s resilience. Still, its success increasingly hinges on having the right conditions for regeneration and the absence of compounding stresses, such as invasive species or continued climate drying.

Ecological Impacts: Benefits and Drawbacks of Wildfires

This section examines the balance between nutrient cycling, habitat heterogeneity, and regeneration, as well as the modern high-severity impacts on biodiversity, soils, waters, and air, demonstrating that net outcomes depend on whether fires occur within or outside historical fire regimes. 

Wildfire is often perceived only as a destructive force, but in ecological terms, fire also performs crucial regenerative and balancing functions. Many ecosystems evolved with fire as a natural disturbance, and consequently, they derive several benefits from periodic fires. At the same time, wildfires – especially in their modern, human-altered context – have numerous negative impacts on both the environment and society. It is essential to acknowledge this dual nature: under the right conditions, fire can enhance ecosystem health and biodiversity, but under extreme or uncharacteristic conditions, it can cause severe ecological damage. Below, we examine both the positive ecological and environmental roles of wildfire and its detrimental effects.

Ecological Benefits of Fire: In fire-adapted ecosystems, wildfires serve as a “reset” mechanism, preventing any single species from monopolizing resources and maintaining habitat diversity.  By clearing out dense underbrush, thick litter layers, and diseased or senescent vegetation, fire opens up space. It releases a flush of nutrients, fostering a patchwork of habitats in different successional stages (Sten). This heterogeneity is highly correlated with biodiversity – diverse stages of burned and unburned regions, or areas burned at varying intensities, provide more diversity in habitats and create different niches to support a broader range of species than uniform climax biomespheres. For example, in prairie grasslands, periodic fires prevent woody shrubs from overtaking the grasses and recycle nutrients bound in dead plant matter, effectively fertilizing the soil with ash(Sten). In the absence of fire, these grasslands would transition to shrublands or forests, resulting in the loss of open-habitat species adapted to grasslands. Fire also plays an irreplaceable role in the cycling of nutrients. The combustion of organic matter releases nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, essential elements for synthesizing macromolecules, which are then made immediately available to new plants as soluble ions in the soil (Zeng et al.). In essence, fire accelerates decomposition – what might have taken years or decades for microbes to break down is converted in minutes to fertile ash. This means that the occurrence of wildfires can lead to a short-term boost in soil fertility and often results in an increase in soil pH, which reduces acidity and benefits certain plant communities. National Geographic summarizes: “Moreover, nutrients released from the burned material, which includes dead plants and animals, return more quickly into the soil than if they had to decay over time slowly. In this way, fire increases soil fertility.” The post-fire flush of nutrients is one reason why burned areas often exhibit exuberant plant growth in the next rainy season.

Fire is also essential for the reproduction and life cycles of numerous species. We discussed above how certain plants need fire to trigger seed release or germination (e.g., serotinous conifers, Ceanothus). Without periodic fires, these species would fail to regenerate and could be outcompeted by others; thus, fire helps preserve their presence in the ecosystem. Iconic examples include the lodgepole pine forests in Yellowstone, which rely on fire to open up seedbeds and reduce competition, allowing their seedlings to survive (National Geographic Society). Likewise, some flowering plants, such as sure lilies, only bloom profusely after fires, utilizing the increased light and nutrients that result. The benefits extend to wildlife: animal populations can depend on post-fire conditions for survival and feeding. The suppression of fires has led to habitat loss for the lupine and declines in the Karner blue butterfly, whereas conservationists now use controlled burns to sustain the butterfly’s habitat. Even soil microbes show resilience and sometimes increased activity after low-intensity fires, due to the sudden availability of carbon and nutrients (“Fire Effect on Soil Nutrient”). Overall, moderate fires can enhance ecosystem productivity in the long run by thinning out stagnating vegetation, controlling pests, and stimulating new growth. According to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, “fire can act as a catalyst for promoting biological diversity and healthy ecosystems by reducing the buildup of organic debris, releasing nutrients into the soil, and triggering changes in vegetation community composition”. These ecological benefits are the rationale behind prescribed burning – the intentional, controlled use of fire by land managers to mimic natural fire regimes and maintain ecosystem health (National Geographic Society). Without fire, some ecosystems would become less rich and more homogeneous, and potentially less resilient to other stresses.

Negative Impacts of Wildfires: Conversely, wildfires – especially the massive, high-intensity fires that are increasingly prevalent today – have numerous negative impacts on the environment. The most immediate is the destruction of vegetation and wildlife. In a severe fire, a vast amount of living biomass (from towering trees to soil microbes) can be killed in a short time. This represents not only a loss of plant cover (leading to habitat loss for animals) but also the loss of ecosystem services provided by that vegetation (such as carbon storage, shade, and soil stabilization). Modern large-scale fires in California and elsewhere have at times imperiled species that are not adapted to such extreme burns. For example, recent fires have killed significant numbers of ancient giant sequoia trees. Researchers had found that recent megafires have killed up to 20% of the world’s mature giant sequoias, and a majority of that 20% perished from three wildfires in 2020 and 2021.” (Soderberg et al.). Wildfires can directly cause animal mortality (especially less mobile species or nestlings) and eliminate critical habitat. After the August Complex Fire of 2020 (a predominantly high-severity burn), biologists noted the destruction of habitat for deer and other wildlife across multiple national forests in Northern California (OEHHA). Large mammals may escape the flames, but they struggle in the aftermath if food and shelter are scarce in the charred landscape. Small populations of endangered species can be wiped out if a fire strikes a last refuge (for instance, the 2020 Bobcat Fire burned a significant portion of the remaining habitat of the critically endangered mountain yellow-legged frog in Southern California). Thus, while fire is a natural phenomenon, the scale and intensity of some contemporary fires pose a serious threat to biodiversity. Research from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife cautions that a typically large scale of high-severity fire can hinder an ecosystem’s ability to recover, leading to long-term or permanent loss of native vegetation and the growth in population of non-native/invasive plants that have adaptation for fire resistance, along with the loss of essential habitat for native species (CDFW). Invasive species often exploit post-fire environments, as seen with grasses like cheatgrass or fast-spreading weeds, which can out-compete native seedlings and alter the species distribution of recovery (Mealor et al. 9-10). This undermines conservation efforts and can set in motion a vicious cycle of more frequent fires and further ecological degradation. (Mealor et al. 9-10)

Wildfires also have profound impacts on soil and water. Intense burns can induce a condition known as soil hydrophobicity, where oils from burnt vegetation penetrate the soil and, upon cooling, form a water-repellent layer. This reduces infiltration of rainwater, greatly increasing surface runoff. Combined with the lack of plant cover and root systems, this leads to severe erosion and mudslides in burned areas, posing a threat to aquatic organisms while also contaminating drinking water sources (OEHHA). It is common in California to see destructive debris flows and flash floods on hillsides in the first winter after a wildfire, as was tragically witnessed in Montecito in January 2018, when heavy rains on the freshly burned Thomas Fire slopes triggered mudflows that killed 23 people, caused at least 167 injuries, and 408 damaged homes (Kean et al. 1). Ecologically, the erosion strips away nutrient-rich topsoil and can smother streams with sediment, harming aquatic life. The deposition of ashes and debris, along with essential nutrients for life such as phosphorus and nitrogen, can lead to algal blooms or fish kills in downstream water bodies.

Furthermore, with vegetation removed, it leads to greater runoff and altered hydrological cycles until the forest regrows. High-severity fires can also sterilize the soil at the site of the fire; the heat exerted from the combustion may kill seed banks, symbiotic fungi, and invertebrates in the upper soil layers, thereby delaying ecosystem recovery and reducing soil quality. Even the soil structure can be damaged, as intense heat can consume soil organic matter. These effects are usually patchy (limited to the hottest burn spots), but where they occur, they pose a significant obstacle to regeneration.

Another significant negative impact of wildfires is on air quality and climate. Wildfire smoke is a hazardous mixture of particulate matter and toxic gases. Locally and regionally, large fires create dangerous air pollution episodes – thick smoke can blanket communities for days or weeks, leading to hospitalizations for respiratory and cardiac issues. Wildfire smoke contains particulate matter (PM2.5), CO, and hydrocarbons, among other pollutants (US Environmental Protection Agency 4) (Laville). During California’s 2020 fire season, cities such as San Francisco and Portland experienced some of the worst air quality indices ever recorded globally, turning daytime skies a deep orange with smoke. Public health studies show increased mortality and morbidity (asthma attacks, COPD exacerbations, etc.) associated with wildfire smoke exposure (Sospedra et al.). The effects are not confined to immediate areas: smoke plumes from massive fires have crossed continents and oceans. For example, smoke from the 2019–2020 Australian bushfires was observed circumnavigating the globe. On a global scale, the carbon emissions from wildfires are a significant concern. Here, it is worth noting that wildfires contribute substantially to greenhouse gas emissions, thus feeding back into climate change. When vegetation burns, the carbon stored in that biomass is released to the atmosphere as CO₂ (along with methane and nitrous oxide in smaller amounts). “Nearly half a gigaton of carbon (or 1.76 billion tons of CO2) was released from burning boreal forests in North America and Eurasia in 2021, 150 percent higher than annual mean CO2 emissions between 2000 and 2020” (UC Irvine). Such figures underscore that wildfires have become a significant and accelerating driver of climate change, in addition to the damage they cause to ecosystems. Additionally, the loss of forests to fire means a loss of future carbon sequestration potential, and if vegetation shifts (e.g., from forest to grassland), a long-term reduction in carbon stored in the soil (Dye et al.).

In summary, while fire, in the proper context, provides ecological benefits (fuel reduction, nutrient cycling, habitat diversity), excessively large or frequent fires can have severe negative impacts. These include the immediate destruction of habitats, long-lasting changes in vegetation composition, soil degradation and increased erosion, compromised water quality, air pollution, and health hazards, as well as contributions to global climate change. The balance of effects depends on the fire regime – its frequency, intensity, size, and season – relative to the ecosystem’s adaptive capacity. A low-intensity burn in a fire-adapted savanna, for instance, might have overwhelmingly positive effects, whereas a megafire in a fragmented landscape near human developments tends to be disastrous both ecologically and economically. According to California department of Wildlife and Fishing, modern fire management seeks to restore a more natural fire regime where it could to maximize fire’s benefits while minimizing its destructive aspects (through prescribed burning, mechanical thinning, prescribed herbivory, and mastication.). As climate change increases the likelihood of conditions becoming more hazardous to fires, addressing the negative impacts of wildfires has become a pressing environmental and societal challenge.

Conclusion

Wildfires depend on climate, ecology, and human society – they are both influenced by and exert influence on all these spheres. As this research has shown, wildfire occurrence and behavior are driven by a combination of factors: ignition sources (increasingly human-related), environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity, wind, and the availability of dry fuel, as well as the biological characteristics of the landscape (including species that can either promote or resist fire). In turn, wildfires act as powerful agents of change in ecosystems, initiating secondary succession and altering the structure and composition of plant and animal communities. We are currently in an era of exceptionally large and severe fires that exceed historical patterns, leading to negative outcomes such as long-term forest loss, soil erosion, air pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions that stimulates global warming.

Does wildfire benefit ecosystems? The answer is diverge. Yes, in many cases, fire has positive ecological effects and is indispensable for ecosystem health and diversity – it curtails disease and pest outbreaks, recycles nutrients, and maintains habitat complexity. Periodic fires can prevent a decrease in biodiversity where a single group of plants or fuel types builds up excessively, thereby reducing catastrophic fire risk and increasing the range of species that the ecosystem can support, thereby creating a more stable ecosystem (Sten). Frequent mild fires were nature’s way of regulating and remige. But not all fires are equal. The catastrophic wildfires of recent years often bring more harm than benefit, as they burn in conditions outside the range to which native biota are adapted, causing destructive effects that exceed the ecosystem’s resilience. These fires have led to the loss of old-growth forests, the conversion of forests to non-forested areas, and declines in certain wildlife populations. The key distinction is whether fires occur within the historical frequency/intensity regime for that ecosystem. When they do, they tend to be net beneficial or at least neutral in the long run; when they do not (unanticpated increase/decrease in frequency, or increase in intensity), the consequences are undoubtably negative.

In practical terms, this means that restoring more natural fire regimes is crucial. Land and fire managers are increasingly adopting strategies, such as prescribed burns and managed wildfires, to reintroduce fire in a controlled manner that mimics natural processes (National Geographic Society). These efforts aim to reduce the combustible fuel loads and create more heterogeneous landscapes, thus lowering the risk of the kind of devastating infernos that have dominated headlines. At the same time, aggressive measures to mitigate climate change are vital, because unchecked warming will continue to intensify fire-promoting conditions faster than our adaptive efforts can keep up (Bell). Protecting communities from wildfire will require a combination of reducing greenhouse gas emissions (to stabilize the climate), adapting building and planning practices, and utilizing the best of ecological and environmental science to manage forests in a resilient manner.

In conclusion, wildfires should be understood not simply as a destructive force to be eliminated, but as a natural process that must be more integrated into ecosystem management. The question is not if fires will occur – they will and indeed must, in fire-adapted biomes – but how and when they occur. By learning from ecological research and historical fire regimes, we can allow fire to resume its role as a regenerator of ecosystems, while minimizing its threats to human life and sensitive resources. In a warming world, achieving this balance is one of the great environmental challenges of our time. The story of wildfire is ultimately one of balance: between growth and renewal versus loss and destruction, and between human influence and natural processes. Striking that balance through informed science-based policy will determine whether future wildfires primarily strengthen our ecosystems – or break them.

This paper’s findings support a clear thesis: wildfire is neither inherently good nor inherently bad; its net effect depends on whether it occurs within the historical frequency, intensity, and seasonality to which the ecosystem is adapted. Accordingly, effective policy should restore more natural fire regimes and landscape heterogeneity through prescribed burning, managed wildfire, and targeted fuel reduction, while simultaneously pursuing climate mitigation and community adaptation to reduce exposure to extreme events.

Works Cited

Bell, Brian. “Wildfires Emitted a Record-Breaking Amount of Carbon Dioxide in 2021.” UCI Special Report: Climate Change – The Problem, University of California, Irvine, Nov. 2022, https://specialreports.news.uci.edu/climate-change/the-problem/wildfires-emitted-a-record-breaking-amount-of-carbon-dioxide.php. Accessed 19 Feb. 2025.

CAL FIRE. “2017 Fire Season Incident Archive (2017 Fire Year in Review).” California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, 2018, https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2017/. Accessed 31 Oct. 2025.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). “Science Institute: Wildfire Impacts (Overview, Fire Ecology).” CDFW Science Institute, 2021, https://wildlife.ca.gov/Science-Institute/Wildfire-Impacts. Accessed 31 Oct. 2025.

California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Order Instituting an Investigation into the 2018 Camp Fire, 2019, https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov. p. 10. Accessed 31 Oct. 2025.

Davison, J., E. Smith, and G. Beck. “Cheatgrass and Wildfire—A Dangerous Combination.” Colorado State University Extension Fact Sheet No. 6.310 (Natural Resources Series – Forestry), rev. May 2012, https://csfs.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Cheatgrass-and-Wildfire-Fact-Sheet-6.310.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb. 2025.

Dye, Alex W., et al. “Carbon, Climate, and Natural Disturbance: A Review of Mechanisms, Challenges, and Tools for Understanding Forest Carbon Stability in an Uncertain Future.” Carbon Balance and Management, vol. 19, no. 2, 2024, https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13021-024-00282-0. Accessed 20 Feb. 2025.

Fovell, Robert. “The Santa Ana Winds.” Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, http://people.atmos.ucla.edu/fovell/ASother/mm5/SantaAna/winds.html. Accessed 31 Oct. 2025.

Kean, Jason W., et al. “Inundation, Flow Dynamics, and Damage in the 9 January 2018 Montecito Debris-Flow Event, California, USA.” Opportunities and Challenges for Post-Wildfire Risk Assessment, vol. 15, no. 14, 2019, https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70203874. Accessed 19 Feb. 2025.

Laville, Sandra. “CO₂ from Wildfires Increases by 9% as Climate Crisis Supercharges Infernos.” The Guardian, 15 Oct. 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/16/extreme-wildfires-increase-carbon-emissions-climate-change. Accessed 31 Oct. 2025.

Long, Jonathan W., et al. “The Importance of Indigenous Cultural Burning in Forested Regions of the Pacific West, USA.” Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 500, 2021, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378112721006873. Accessed 4 Mar. 2025.

Lukes, Laura. “There’s Green in the Burn.” The Real Dirt (UC Master Gardener of Butte County Blog), University of California Agriculture & Natural Resources, http://ucanr.edu/blog/real-dirt/article/theres-green-burn. Accessed 13 Feb. 2025.

Mealor, Brian A., et al. Cheatgrass Management Handbook, vol. 1, University of Wyoming, Laramie, and Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 2013, https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/cheatgrass_management_handbook_0.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb. 2025.

NASA ICESat-2 Mission. “Wildfires.” NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Applications White Papers, 2015, https://icesat-2.gsfc.nasa.gov/whitepapers/wildfires. Accessed 31 Oct. 2025.

National Geographic Society. “The Ecological Benefits of Fire.” National Geographic Education Resource Library, 15 Aug. 2024, https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/ecological-benefits-fire/. Accessed 13 Feb. 2025.

National Interagency Fire Center. “Current National Statistics.” 24 Oct. 2025, https://www.nifc.gov/fire-information/statistics. Accessed 12 Feb. 2025.

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). “Wildfires.” Indicators of Climate Change in California (2022 Report), California EPA, 24 Oct. 2025, https://oehha.ca.gov/climate-change/epic-2022/impacts-vegetation-and-wildlife/wildfires. Accessed 25 Oct. 2025.

Soderberg, David N., et al. “Assessing Giant Sequoia Mortality and Regeneration Following High-Severity Wildfire.” Ecosphere, vol. 15, no. 3, 2024, pp. 1–20, https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.4789. Accessed 18 Feb. 2025.

Sten, Michaela. “Fire-Adapted: Plants and Animals Rely on Wildfires for Resilient Ecosystems.” Defenders of Wildlife, 12 July 2020, https://defenders.org/blog/2020/07/fire-adapted-plants-and-animals-rely-wildfires-resilient-ecosystems. Accessed 31 Oct. 2025.

UC Irvine. “Wildfires Emitted a Record-Breaking Amount of Carbon Dioxide in 2021.” Special Report for Climate Change, University of California, Irvine, https://specialreports.news.uci.edu/climate-change/the-problem/wildfires-emitted-a-record-breaking-amount-of-carbon-dioxide.php. Accessed 19 Feb. 2025.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Wildfire Smoke: A Guide for Public Health Officials, 2019, pp. 4–5, https://www.airnow.gov/sites/default/files/2021-05/wildfire-smoke-guide-revised-2019-chapters-1-3.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb. 2025.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “Climate Change Indicators: Wildfires.” 2024, https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-wildfires. Accessed 21 Feb. 2025.

Zeng, Lingqun, et al. “Speciation and Aqueous Dissolution of Macronutrients in Fire Ash: Variation across Ecosystems and the Effects on Nutrient Cycling.” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 59, no. 1, 2024, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c07101. Accessed 7 Feb. 2025.

(All URLs accessed Feb-Oct 2025)